Expanding the shorthand, the definition of toy-store@ could almost be written as
(define toy-store@ (unit (import toy-factory^) (export toy-store^) (define inventory null) (define (store-color) 'green) ....))
A difference between this expansion and define-unit is that the imports and exports of toy-store@ cannot be inferred. That is, besides combining define and unit, define-unit attaches static information to the defined identifier so that its signature information is available statically to define-values/invoke-unit/infer and other forms.
Despite the drawback of losing static signature information, unit can be useful in combination with other forms that work with first-class values. For example, we could wrap a unit that creates a toy store in a lambda to supply the store’s color:
#lang racket (require "toy-store-sig.rkt" "toy-factory-sig.rkt") (define toy-store@-maker (lambda (the-color) (unit (import toy-factory^) (export toy-store^) (define inventory null) (define (store-color) the-color) ; the rest is the same as before (define (maybe-repaint t) (if (eq? (toy-color t) (store-color)) t (repaint t (store-color)))) (define (stock! n) (set! inventory (append inventory (map maybe-repaint (build-toys n))))) (define (get-inventory) inventory)))) (provide toy-store@-maker)
To invoke a unit created by toy-store@-maker, we must use define-values/invoke-unit, instead of the /infer variant:
> (require "simple-factory-unit.rkt") > (define-values/invoke-unit/infer simple-factory@)
> (require "toy-store-maker.rkt")
> (define-values/invoke-unit (toy-store@-maker 'purple) (import toy-factory^) (export toy-store^)) > (stock! 2) > (get-inventory)
(list (toy 'purple) (toy 'purple))
In the define-values/invoke-unit form, the (import toy-factory^) line takes bindings from the current context that match the names in toy-factory^ (the ones that we created by invoking simple-factory@), and it supplies them as imports to toy-store@. The (export toy-store^) clause indicates that the unit produced by toy-store@-maker will export toy-store^, and the names from that signature are defined after invoking the unit.
To link a unit from toy-store@-maker, we can use the compound-unit form:
> (require "store-specific-factory-unit.rkt")
> (define toy-store+factory@ (compound-unit (import) (export TF TS) (link [((TF : toy-factory^)) store-specific-factory@ TS] [((TS : toy-store^)) toy-store@ TF])))
This compound-unit form packs a lot of information into one place. The left-hand-side TF and TS in the link clause are binding identifiers. The identifier TF is essentially bound to the elements of toy-factory^ as implemented by store-specific-factory@. The identifier TS is similarly bound to the elements of toy-store^ as implemented by toy-store@. Meanwhile, the elements bound to TS are supplied as imports for store-specific-factory@, since TS follows store-specific-factory@. The elements bound to TF are similarly supplied to toy-store@. Finally, (export TF TS) indicates that the elements bound to TF and TS are exported from the compound unit.
The above compound-unit form uses store-specific-factory@ as a first-class unit, even though its information could be inferred. Every unit can be used as a first-class unit, in addition to its use in inference contexts. Also, various forms let a programmer bridge the gap between inferred and first-class worlds. For example, define-unit-binding binds a new identifier to the unit produced by an arbitrary expression; it statically associates signature information to the identifier, and it dynamically checks the signatures against the first-class unit produced by the expression.